English 101: English Composition
Fall 2013 Syllabus
Section: BS Instructor:
Joe Van Zutphenn
Room: JSH 115 Office:
AA5 - 209
Meeting Times: T/Th 8:00 – 10:20 E-mail: jvanzutphen@clark.edu Homepage:
Office
Hours: by appt.
This five-credit class is designed to help you
write confidently and competently in many of the writing situations you will
encounter in other classes and in your professional life. To accomplish this
goal, we will practice techniques such as the writing process, active reading,
and revision-focused writing throughout the quarter. When the quarter is over,
you may not be a master at writing, reading, or critical thinking—mastering
these skills represents a lifetime’s work—but if you work hard you will be a
much better writer, reader, and thinker at the end of the class than you were
at the beginning.
English 101 is a college level course: that is,
students must either be placed into this class by a recommending score on the
COMPASS test or by having received a grade of C or better in English 098.
The English department has laid out the skills that
students should be able to perform at the end of each composition class. This
list, called the Student Learning Outcomes, appears on the class web page
(http://english101clarkcollegevanzutphen.blogspot.com/). If you look under the column headed “English 101 Outcomes,” you
will see the writing, reading, and research tasks that successful students will
be able to perform by the end of this class.
Instructional Methods Used:
English 101 is a class best taught by a combination
of instructional methods. The method students will encounter most frequently is
the class discussion, in which the teacher is not so much a lecturer as a
facilitator of student conversation. We will use class discussion to explore
the issues we will be writing about. Additionally, students will often evaluate
their writing or explore class concepts using small group discussions or
workshops. On a few occasions during the quarter I will give formal lectures,
particularly to explain grammar or citation concepts. Finally, and most
importantly, students will spend a good deal of time writing in class, both as
a tool for discovery, for assessment of student ability, and for practicing our
writing skills.
The bulk of the work for this class will involve
reading twelve or so challenging, college-level essays and articles, as well as
writing several essays, summaries, responses, and other writing assignments.
More specifically, you will write six essays over the course of the quarter,
four of which will be written as take home assignments over a period of roughly
two weeks each. The other two essays will be in-class writing exams which will
occur at midterm and during finals week. Each of these essay assignments will
be different, with different length requirements, structures, and topics,
though all will require that you analyze the topic critically and respond to it
with college-level writing.
In addition to your writing essays and tests, I
will ask you to practice your writing with shorter day-to-day assignments. Most
of these assignments will be short—summaries, reader responses, and the
like—and you will submit them for a quick “check-off” grade. For some
assignments, I may ask you to provide evidence of active reading or to fill out
a brief grammar exercise, but most of the day-to-day assignments will involve
writing. Research (and common sense) suggest that if you want to be a better
writer you must write, and these day-to-day assignments offer you an
opportunity to practice your skills.
Finally, because good writing depends so much on
revision, I will ask you to help one another revise essays by working in peer
response groups. These groups will meet several times during the class and you
will be graded on the quality of your participation in these groups.
Grading
As you can see by the grade scale below, your work
is graded more heavily at the end of the quarter than at the beginning. This is
deliberate. It really isn’t very important to me how strong (or weak) a writer
and reader you are at the beginning of the quarter; what matters to me is how
much you learn in this class and how competently you can write at the end.
Assignment
|
Points of Final Grade
|
Take-Home Essay 1
|
15
|
|
Take-Home Essay 2
|
20
|
|
|
30
|
|
Take-Home Essay 4
|
50
|
|
In-Class Exam 1
|
10
|
|
In-Class Exam 2
|
15
|
|
In-class writing and other
homework
|
30
|
|
Peer response, attendance, participation
|
30
200
|
|
Regarding the question of how these assignments will be graded, the end of this syllabus
contains a chart of my grading criteria for the essays and day-to-day
assignments. I will also post documents soon that describe these grading
criteria in greater detail. Your peer response participation grade will depend
on the quality and quantity of written comments and suggestions you make on
your classmates’ papers during peer response workshops.
All students have the opportunity to turn in any one assignment up to five days
late without incurring a grade penalty. There’s a little form to fill out and
email to me; you can find it on the class web page (http://english101clarkcollegevanzutphen.blogspot.com/ ). Once you have used this permission,
though, any other late assignments you turn in will be lowered by a full letter
grade for every calendar day (not class day) that they are late. Note that the
permission slip is good for turning in a paper up to five days late; papers
later than this will receive severe grade penalties. Papers are due at the start of class and an assignment that is turned in later that day is considered a
day late. Please understand also that I will always grade assignments which
have been turned in on time before I will grade a late assignment; therefore,
if you turn in an assignment late, it will not be graded as promptly. Finally,
keep in mind that no late assignment may be turned in for any reason after the
last regular class day of the quarter.
I accept no assignments via e-mail.
Each assignment will be graded on a scale of 0-100,
corresponding to the following grade scale:
93-100 A
90-92 A-
88-89 B+
83-87 B
80-82 B-
78-79 C+
73-77 C
70-72 C-
68-69 D+
63-67 D
60-62 D-
<60 F
Students who receive a grade of C or can move on to
English 102 or English 109 next quarter. Those who receive a grade of C- or
lower will need to retake English 101.
Required
Text:
Hacker, Diana. Rules for Writers. 6th ed. Boston, MA.
Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2008.
Other
Materials:
You will need to have access to a computer with a
word processor and an Internet connection. Don’t despair if you don’t own a
computer: there are many computer labs at Clark College
for student use. While we’re on the subject, it’s a good idea to save your work
in two places, such as on a thumb drive and in an email account: please back up
your work frequently, as essays which are erased/virus-infected/eaten by
computers are your responsibility.
Finally, you’ll need some kind of paper notebook or
folder for day-to-day writing. A single spiral bound notebook should be fine.
Attendance: Please come
to class and be on time. While I am happy to work with students who must miss a
class because of a genuine emergency, students simply will not do well in the
course if they make a habit of missing class. You only get one chance this
quarter to turn your work in late, and a good share of your final grade
corresponds to work you will be doing in class. Also, students are given credit
for peer response workshops only if they participate in the workshops during
class time. In short, you need to be here regularly if you want to do well. I
will be taking attendance to encourage your staying caught up with the
challenging class material. Students may miss up to five class days for any
reason; after that, each subsequent absence will lower the student’s overall
grade by 3%. Students who have missed more than ten class days will
automatically receive a final class grade of C- or lower.
The only exception to these rules occurs in the
first week of the quarter. During that time, in accordance with English
department policy, I will drop any student who misses a class during the first
two class meetings and does not get in touch with me.
Class
Courtesy: Having a safe and civil atmosphere for learning depends on all of us.
When we speak with one another, especially when disagreeing, it is vital that
we do so with mutual respect. Students who are disruptive or abusive towards
others may be asked to leave the class. On a related note, it is both
disruptive and rude to leave your cell phone on in the classroom. Please turn
it off when you come to class.
Plagiarism: Students who
copy the words or ideas of any other writer without acknowledging the original
author of those words or ideas are engaging in plagiarism. Plagiarism is
grounds for failing this course. One of the goals of this course is to
understand how to use information effectively and ethically in your writing.
Once those concepts have been introduced, any instances of plagiarism will
result in severe grade penalties for the student. In most cases, these
penalties lead to failure of the class.
For more information about the English department’s
plagiarism policy, please follow this link:
http://www.clark.edu/Library/PDF/eng_dept_statement_plagiarism.pdf
Americans with Disabilities Act Accommodations: If you have,
or think you have, a disability which interferes with your performance in this
course, you are invited to speak with the Disability Support Services office in
Gaiser Hall or at 992-2580 for assistance.
Weather
Closures and Instructor Illness: Students now have the ability to check on line
each day to be sure that their classes are meeting. To access this information
go to the Clark College website and click on Quick
Links, then on Classes Today. It will show any classes that have
been cancelled for that day only.
Tentative Schedule
Date
|
Class Activities
|
What’s Due?
|
Week
1
(1/08- 1/10)
|
Introduction to the course;
discussion of syllabus; discussion of active reading and summaries;
introduction to writing process. Essay 1 assigned.
|
Diagnostic
Writing
|
|
Week
2
(1/15- 1/17)
|
Sentence grammar review;
introduction to peer response; review of paragraphing; discussion of common
reading for essay 1. Peer response of essay 1.
|
Essay
1
|
|
Week
3
(1/22- 1/24
|
Review of comma usage; basic
citation methods introduced; The
Aristotelian Rhetoric; discussion of revision strategies. Essay 2
assigned.
|
|
|
Week
4
(1/29- 1/31
|
The Rogerian argument;
discussion of common readings for essay 2; peer response of essay 2.
|
Essay
2
|
|
Week 5
(2/5 - 2/7)
|
Essay 3 assigned. Discussion of common readings for essay 3. Practice with impromptu
writing.
|
In-Class
Exam 1
|
|
Week 6
(2/12 -
2/14)
|
Discussion of common readings
for essay 3; peer response for essay
3. Practice with impromptu writing.
|
Essay 3
|
|
Week 7
(2/19 -
2/21)
|
Essay
4 assigned. Advanced citation methods introduced; evaluating
logic; Toulmin analysis. Discussion of common readings for essay 4;
|
|
|
Week 8
(2/26 -
2/28)
|
Peer
response for essay 4; discussion of logical fallacies; discussion of
writing style.
|
|
|
Week 9
(3/5 -3/7)
|
Discussion of common readings
for essay 4; peer response for essay
4; discussion of logical fallacies; discussion of writing style.
|
Essay 4
|
|
Week
10
(3/12 -3/14)
|
Review
and final revisions; final practice on impromptu writing
Final
exam – in-class
|
Rewrite of essay 1,2, or 3;
In-class exam 2
|
|
Week
11
(3/19 -3/21)
|
Final
conference
|
|
|
Please note: while I have done my best to provide
all necessary information for the class here, this syllabus is subject to
change. Also, many assignments like specific readings, grammar exercises, and
in-class writing exercises do not appear on this schedule, as their scheduling
depends on how quickly or slowly the class proceeds. Please attend class and
talk with me regularly so that you will not be surprised by changes. I will
provide a more detailed day-by-day schedule for each essay; these schedules
will supersede the schedule given here. Note also that any changes to the
syllabus will be announced in the assignment sheets and made as changes to the
syllabus on my web page.
What Makes a Good English 101
Essay?
Most students can read another student’s essay and
tell whether it is good or not so good. Just like teachers, when you read a
classmate’s work you get a first impression about whether the essay is strong
or weak. However, answering why an
essay is strong or weak becomes more difficult. Though this is a difficult
question to answer when looking at a classmate’s essay, it is an even tougher
question to apply to your own writing.
What follows is a brief list of qualities that make
your writing strong. When looking at another student’s writing or evaluating
your own, think of the essay in these terms. If you ever wonder why you
received a certain grade on an essay in this class, the answer has to do with
the qualities listed below.
Focus: A
well-focused essay speaks about one main topic, called the thesis, and
does not stray from it. In the case of short 101 essays, this main topic can
often be identified in a single statement in the essay, called the thesis statement. Even when there is no
single explicit thesis statement, however, the essay should be focused around a
single idea. The main topic of the essay is not so broad that you cannot
explore it fully in your paper; also, it is not so narrow that you cannot
develop it (for more on development, see below). Though you may write an essay
of many paragraphs with many different arguments and pieces of evidence,
everything in the essay should ultimately support your main idea.
Development: An essay is
well developed when every claim you make is supported by evidence of some kind,
as well as by a sound and logical argument. This evidence should be appropriate
to the argument you are making, relevant to the case at hand, and reputable. In
addition, a good writer uses logic that is sound and well thought-out. A
well-developed essay does not claim anything to be true without offering
evidence to show why or how it is true.
Audience
Awareness: Good writers tailor their essays towards the needs of the audience, or
reader. For example, a good writer chooses a tone that does not insult or talk
down to the reader; similarly, good essays are written at a level that the
audience is likely to be able to comprehend. In other words, a writer with good
audience awareness writes in a style that is readable and which sounds natural.
In all communication, what we mean to say and what we actually do say can be
very different things; however, good writers work hard to minimize this
difference. A writer with good audience awareness also does not make unfair
assumptions about the reader’s gender, race, religion, class, sexuality, or
value system.
Organization: Strong
essays are well organized into paragraphs. Each paragraph focuses on a single
idea—often this one idea can be conveyed in a single topic sentence—and displays a logical strategy for conveying its
information. Each paragraph should be unified by intelligent use of transitions
and key words. Similarly, a good writer uses transitions to link paragraphs
into a sequence. This sequence of paragraphs should be logical and should serve
to support the essay’s thesis.
Correctness: Strong
essays display correct sentence grammar, punctuation, sentence unity,
agreement, syntax, and spelling. While it is normal for English 101 students to
make grammatical mistakes once in a while, by the time you finish this class
you should have pretty strong control over sentence structure and sentence
form.
Research and
Citations: When it’s called for, students should know how to find outside
information to support their arguments. They should also know how to cite this
outside information correctly, giving proper credit wherever another writer’s
words or ideas are used.